Tool Evaluation
Financial reporting platform selection analysis
Evaluation Matrix
| Criteria (Weight) | Platform | Adaptive Planning | Power BI Builder |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Fit (40%) | 94% | 72% | 60% |
| Integration Ease (30%) | 88% | 65% | 78% |
| Cost (20%) | 74% | 58% | 82% |
| Governance (10%) | 92% | 70% | 55% |
| Weighted Total | 88.0% | 66.9% | 69.3% |
| Rank | #1 | #2 | #3 |
Weighted Score Comparison
Recommendation
Selected Tool
Port Houston Financial Reporting Platform
Rationale
Highest weighted score (88.6%) with strongest functional fit for GASB compliance reporting, multi-stream P&L analysis, and integrated governance workflows. Superior integration capabilities with existing Workday and Navis N4 systems. Built-in metric dictionary and approval workflows eliminate need for separate governance tooling.
Decision Date
Q3 2025
Decision By
Diana Reeves
Decision Log
| Date | Evaluators | Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 | Diana Reeves, Raj Anand, Janet Okoro | Selected Port Houston Financial Reporting Platform | Highest weighted score (88.6%), best functional fit for GASB reporting and FP&A workflows, strongest governance features |